Attendees: Bill Meadows, Lisa Seaburg (chaired meeting), Peter Yim, Mike Adcock, Debbie Q., Michael Suebert, Jon Bosak, Monica Martin
1. Welcome from Chair and appointment of Secretary to take minutes - Lisa is taking minutes.
Regrets from Tim.
2. Acceptance of previous minutes - Did not have quorum, but continued with critical mass.
3. Release 0p70
Oustanding Issues from Plenary...
Tim also sent updated Transport model, still needs to be looked at. Mike Adcock has taken complete Order model as far as he could, waiting for outcome of certain pieces. Message Assembly, Mike Adcock (timeframe is over the next two weeks). Mike will try to get the message assembly document out for the week of Dec 2nd, so that LCSC will have that week to look it over. The next step is QA and building schemas and NDR review (week of 16th Dec.)
Decisions that come out of the transport process and the price component are needed before this can continue.
Mike: After this there will also be UML models of the messages. These models go to the Analysis team. SAP will use their tool to develop the object class models that we saw in Menlo Park.
Mike: We have sorted this out. Chris Nelson spent time working on this. This work is complete. This work will be available on the website within the this week.
Gunther is testing the schema generation against the new spreadsheet. Timeframe is: This should be done this week, Chris was suppose to get materials to Gunther over weekend.
Other Discussion Points:
Peter: Does the Scope document need to be updated to reflect the new work and changes?
Mike: We need to look into this, I think the Analysis team work could create some needed changes.
The Timeline says our signoff and publish is January 13th, we will move the publish to the week of January 6th. This possibly makes January 13th the distribute date. We need to keep on top of this. The Liaison schedule is not complete for January yet, it may be Jan 10th.
Jon: We are hoping to tell the Liaison SC to expect a review package at the Dec 20th meeting. It is important to let them know if they will have something coming or not.
Mike: We should have a better feel for it all by then and be able to feel confident that the distribution will happen on time.
4. Analysis Team report (Sue/Michael) -
Just started yesterday, not much to report yet. By next week there will be something to report. There are some questions already, they will send out emails to the appropriate people.
5. Assembly Team report (Mike) - Already reported above.
6. QA Team report
* Scope Statement - There were some changes made during the Face 2 Face, the document was adopted by group subject to the idea the analysis work may make changes necessary. Mike will send to Bill Meadows.
7. Reports on status of other UBL subcommittees
Lisa Seaburg was suggested because she is on both committees, we need to vote for this through email.
8. Other Business -
Votes needed to be done. ACTION ITEM: (Tim) Send out email vote.
Next Meeting -
This is the meeting schedule copied out of the Plenary report. Notes are made next to the first two meetings, there are still some questions on chair and phone numbers. Once this is cleared up, the other meetings will get their information listed also.
There was also discussion of a Analysis Team meeting at 5am PST, Chaired by Sue and Michael. There was discussion also of having this every Tuesday through December, I will complete schedule when I get information from Sue and Michael.
Meeting Adjorned at 10:46am.