Logistics
Roll-call
Other
Business
Business
In Order
Action
Items & Motions
References
Meeting Date |
09/30/2002 |
Meeting Time |
12:00 pm CDT |
Location |
Dial-in Number: 888-742-8686 |
Duration |
1 Hour |
Chair |
Darran Rolls |
Recording Secretary |
Gavenraj Sodhi |
Agenda |
As published as of September 30th, 2002 |
Present
|
|
(GS) |
Gavenraj Sodhi, Business Layers |
(YK) |
Yoav Kirsch, Business Layers |
(HL) |
Hal Lockhart, Entegrity Solutions |
(JB) |
Jeff Bohren, OpenNetwork
Technologies |
(CS) |
Cliff Schmidt, Microsoft |
(DR) |
Darran Rolls, Waveset |
(MP) |
Mike Polan, IBM
Canada |
(TM) |
Tim Moses,
Entrust |
(ML) |
Matthias Leibmann, Microsoft |
(JB) |
James Booth Microsoft |
None |
|
1 |
Motion to accept minutes of committee meeting 08/19/2002 |
DR |
Minutes
available [1]. - Approved |
2 |
Update |
DR |
Where are we on core specification development? Proposal for joint development initiatives. |
3 |
F2F |
DR |
What are the dates? End of October (29, 30), beginning of November (5,6 & 12, 13) Location: Redmond, WA |
4 |
Core Identity Schema |
DR |
Discuss need for a core identity schema. Overview of that�s out there. Suggestions/champions for investigation. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/provision/docs/SPMLCoreIdentitySchema.ppt |
5 |
Core Identity Schema Discussion |
DR |
Develop small subgroup to
develop an implementation as a core point of discussion over the next four
weeks.
-
Waveset steps up
- Business Layers
steps up |
|
Core
Identity Schema
- Core identifier YK
- For the User object in the requirements, we should decide what class we
should use. No need of
identity schema. (WILL BE
PLACED ON ISSUES LIST) JB
- Agrees with representation of user as long as it is a
recommendation Mike
(IBM) - Leave it open as to what Identity standard to be able to
use DR
- Any other identity standards we did not list? Microsoft
- RSC from DSML may be useful to look at. YK
- No concept of user in Virtual ID from Use Cases Hal
- Doesn't understand the difference between user and
account. YK
- Attribute of user holding the service JB
- Use Case 1 & 2 required Identity Schema (line
31)
- Giving user account data
- We have to recognize that people have to extend beyond
recommending an identity schema DR
- we should look at the RFC2251 (INetOrgPerson)
schema Grp
- Let's pick up something and move forward |
6 |
Motion to Adjourn |
DR |
Meeting adjourned at 12:47 a.m. CT to re convene Monday, October 14th, 2002 at 12 noon CDT |
|
Owner |
Action Item |
1 |
DR |
Champion submission of an �SPML based on SAML� proposal. |
2 |
Mike (IBM) |
Aggregated service use case. |
3 |
GW/TG |
Statement clearly articulating Identity issue |
4 |
GS |
ADPr Basis of Discussion |
|
Motions |
|
|
Motion to adjourn |
Accepted |
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/provision/minutes/pstc-minutes-08192002.html